Questionnaire for PIPVIC partners

PIPVIC Seminars and Meetings

This questionnaire is for evaluating the seminars and weekly meetings. Please fill in this form and press submit. Thank you.

Name:

Site: UCL UCL Language Centre Exeter Aberystwyth Essex SSEES Westminster UKERNA

Seminars

Audio and Video Quality - Seminars

Please rate the overall quality of the audio and video of the seminars, by giving a number between 0-100 for audio and video respectively. 0 represents the worse quality you can imagine; 100 represent the best quality you can imagine. You should not rate the quality in terms of what you are used to from TV - but in terms of how adequate the audio and video is for attending remote seminars.

Audio (0-100):
Please enter any comments you may have about the audio quality in the box:



Video (0-100):

Please enter any comments you may have about the video quality in the box:


Task Related Assessment - Seminars


This section deals with how well you think the technology supported you for your task of receiving and/or giving the seminars. You may want to comment on issues like how well the technology/tools supported the displaying of slides, or how well it the technology/tools supported people asking questions etc.

Please enter your comments in the box:



Overall Assessment - Seminars


This section deals with any other issues that have not already been covered in this questionnaire. You may want to comment on issues like how seminars were influenced by network problems, usability of the individual tools, i.e. were the difficult to use, etc.

Please enter your comments in the box:


Meetings

Audio and Video Quality - Meetings

Please rate the overall quality of the audio and video of the meetings, by giving a number between 0-100 for audio and video respectively. 0 represents the worse quality you can imagine; 100 represent the best quality you can imagine. You should not rate the quality in terms of what you are used to from TV - but in terms of how adequate the audio and video is for remote meetings.

Audio (0-100):

Please enter any comments you may have about the audio quality in the box:



Video (0-100):

Please enter any comments you may have about the video quality in the box:


Task Related Assessment - Meetings


This section deals with how well you think the technology supported the meetings. You may want to comment on issues like how well the technology/tools supported collaborative tasks like taking minutes, or how well it the technology/tools supported so many people working together.

Please enter your comments in the box:



Overall Assessment - Meetings


This section deals with any other issues that have not already been covered in this questionnaire. You may want to comment on issues like how meetings were influenced by network problems, usability of the individual tools, i.e. were the difficult to use, etc.

Please enter your comments in the box:


Back to main PIPVIC page
Click here to mail comments about this form.