Copyright ©1998-2001 W3C® (MIT, INRIA, Keio), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability, trademark, document use and software licensing rules apply.
"Ruby" are short runs of text alongside the base text, typically used in East Asian documents to indicate pronunciation or to provide a short annotation. This specification defines markup for ruby, in the form of an XHTML module [XHTMLMOD].
This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. The latest status of this series of documents is maintained at the W3C.
This document has been reviewed by W3C Members and other interested parties and has been endorsed by the Director as a W3C Recommendation. It is a stable document and may be used as reference material or cited as a normative reference from another document. W3C's role in making the Recommendation is to draw attention to the specification and to promote its widespread deployment. This enhances the functionality and interoperability of the Web.
This document has been produced as part of the W3C Internationalization Activity by the Internationalization Working Group (I18N WG, members only) with the help of the Internationalization Interest Group (I18N IG). Comments should be sent to the publicly archived mailing list www-i18n-comments@w3.org. Comments in languages other than English, in particular Japanese, are also welcome. Public discussion of this document takes place on the www-international@w3.org mailing list (see archive).
Due to its subject matter, and to make the examples more realistic, this document includes examples using a wide range of characters. Not all user agents may be able to display all characters. Depending on the user agent, changing the configuration can improve the situation. Also, great care has been taken to serve this document in various character encodings to cover a wide range of user agents and configurations.
Information related to this document can be found on the public ruby page (http://www.w3.org/International/O-HTML-ruby). This includes translations of this specification as well as potential errata. A list of current W3C Recommendations and other technical documents can be found at http://www.w3.org/TR.
There have been no declarations regarding patents related to this specification within the Internationalization Working Group.
ruby
elementrbc
elementrtc
elementrb
elementrt
elementrp
elementThis section is informative.
This document presents an overview of ruby annotation and defines the markup for it. Several examples are provided. However, this document does not specify any mechanisms for presentation or styling of ruby annotation; this is part of the respective style sheet languages.
This document is organized as follows:
Section 1.1 gives an overview of ruby annotation.
Section 1.2 gives an overview of the markup for ruby annotation.
Section 2 provides the normative definition of ruby markup.
Section 3 discusses typical rendering and styling of ruby text.
Section 4 provides conformance criteria.
Ruby is the term used for a run of text that is associated with another run of text, referred to as the base text. Ruby text is used to provide a short annotation of the associated base text. It is most often used to provide a reading (pronunciation guide). Ruby annotations are used frequently in Japan in many kinds of publications, including books and magazines. Ruby is also used in China, especially in schoolbooks.
Ruby text is usually presented alongside the base text, using a smaller typeface. The name "ruby" in fact originated from the name of the 5.5pt font size in British printing, which is about half the 10pt font size commonly used for normal text. Figure 1.1 shows an example, with three ideographs (kanji) as base text, and six hiragana giving the reading (shinkansen - Japanese bullet train).
East Asian typography has developed various features that do not appear in western typography. Most of these can be addressed appropriately with style sheet languages such as CSS or XSL. However, additional markup is required to define the association between base text and ruby text.
This specification defines such markup, designed to be usable with XHTML, so that ruby text is available on the Web without using special workarounds or graphics. Although this specification gives examples of actual rendering to make it easier for most readers to understand the markup, all such examples are informational only. This document does not specify any mechanisms for presentation or styling; this is part of the respective style sheet languages.
Sometimes more than one ruby text is associated with the same base text. A typical example is to indicate both meaning as well as reading for the same base text. In such cases, ruby texts may appear on both sides of the base text. Ruby text before the base text is often used to indicate reading; ruby text after the base text is often used to indicate meaning. Figure 1.2 shows an example of base text with two ruby texts, giving reading using hiragana and Latin letters.
In addition, each ruby text may be associated with different, but overlapping, parts of the base text, such as in the following example:
Month | Day | Year |
10 | 31 | 2002 |
Expiration Date |
Figure 1.3: Base text with two ruby texts using different associations
In this example, the base text is the date "10 31 2002". One ruby text is the phrase "Expiration Date". This ruby text is associated with the entire base text. The other ruby text has 3 parts: "Month", "Day" and "Year". Each part is associated with a different part of the base text. "Month" is associated with "10", "Day" is associated with "31", and "Year" is associated with "2002".
The markup defined in this specification is designed to cover all the above cases, namely markup for one or two ruby texts associated with the same base text and markup for associations of substrings of the ruby text(s) with components of the base text.
There are two variants of ruby markup, called simple ruby markup and complex ruby markup. Simple ruby markup associates a single ruby text with a run of base text. Simple ruby markup can also specify a fallback mechanism to allow display of ruby text by (older) browsers that do not know about ruby markup. Complex ruby markup can associate two ruby texts with one base text, and can define a more fine-grained association between components of the ruby text and the base text. However, complex ruby markup does not provide a fallback mechanism for browsers that do not understand ruby markup.
This section gives an overview of the markup for ruby defined in this specification. A full formal definition can be found in Section 2.
In the simplest case, ruby markup defines a ruby
element
which contains one rb
element for the base text and one
rt
element for the ruby text. This ruby
element
therefore creates an association between the base text and the ruby text, and
is sufficient for most cases. Here is an example
of simple ruby markup:
<ruby> <rb>WWW</rb> <rt>World Wide Web</rt> </ruby>
Figure 1.4: Example of simple ruby markup
This may be rendered as follows:
Figure 1.5: Example of rendering for simple ruby markup in Figure 1.4
Note: The name of this enclosing element,
"<ruby
>", should be interpreted to mean that its contents
are associating ruby text with base text. It must not be
misunderstood to mean that everything inside, including the base text,
is ruby. The name of the enclosing element was chosen to compactly
and clearly identify the function of the markup construct; the names for the
other elements were chosen to keep the overall length short.
Some user agents might not understand ruby markup, or may not be able to render ruby text appropriately. In either situation, it is generally preferable to render ruby text, so that information is not lost. A generally acceptable fallback is to place the ruby text immediately after the base text, and to enclose the ruby text in parentheses. The parentheses reduce the potential for confusing the ruby text with other text. (It should be noted that text in parentheses in Japanese typography is never called "ruby".)
For compatibility with older user agents that do not understand ruby
markup and simply render the content of elements they do not understand,
rp
elements can be added to simple ruby markup to distinguish
ruby text.
The element name rp
stands for "ruby parenthesis". The
rp
elements and the parentheses (or other characters) inside
them are provided as a fallback mechanism only. User agents that ignore
unknown elements, but render their contents, will display the contents of
each rp
element. Therefore the rp
element can be
used to denote both the beginning and end of ruby text.
User agents that do know about ruby markup will recognize the
rp
element, and intentionally not display its contents. Instead,
they will render the simple ruby markup in a more appropriate way.
The following example demonstrates the use of
the rp
element:
<ruby> <rb>WWW</rb> <rp>(</rp><rt>World Wide Web</rt><rp>)</rp> </ruby>
Figure 1.6: Example of simple ruby markup including
rp
elements for fallback
User agents that either:
will render the above markup as:
WWW (World Wide Web)
Figure 1.7: Rendering of simple ruby markup using fallback parentheses
User agents that do know about ruby markup, and that have more sophisticated presentation styles for ruby text, will choose to not render the parentheses. For example, the markup of figure 1.6 can be rendered as shown in the next figure.
Complex ruby markup is used to associate more than one ruby text with a base text, or to associate parts of ruby text with parts of base text.
Complex ruby markup provides for multiple rb
and
rt
elements. This specification defines container elements that
make the association between the individual elements clear. The ruby base
container element, rbc
, encloses rb
elements. There
can be one or two ruby text container elements, rtc
, that
enclose rt
elements. This allows association of two ruby text
containers with the same base text. With complex ruby markup it is also
possible to associate parts of the base text with parts of a ruby text by
using a number of rb
elements, and a corresponding number of
rt
elements. In addition, the rt
element may use
the rbspan
attribute to indicate that a single rt
element spans (is associated with) multiple rb
elements. This is
similar to the colspan
attribute of the th
and td
elements in tables ([HTML4], section 11.2.6).
Where and how each part of complex ruby markup is rendered is defined as part of the respective style sheet languages; see also section 3 for further information.
The following example shows all these features.
<ruby> <rbc> <rb>10</rb> <rb>31</rb> <rb>2002</rb> </rbc> <rtc> <rt>Month</rt> <rt>Day</rt> <rt>Year</rt> </rtc> <rtc> <rt rbspan="3">Expiration Date</rt> </rtc> </ruby>
Figure 1.9: Complex ruby markup to associate two ruby texts with different parts of the same base text.
In this example, the first ruby text container encloses 3 components ("Month", "Day", "Year"). Each of these components is associated with a corresponding component in the base text ("10", "31", "2002"). The second ruby text container ("Expiration Date") consists of a single ruby text, and is associated with the entire base text ("10 31 2002"). It may be rendered as shown in figure 1.10.
Month | Day | Year |
10 | 31 | 2002 |
Expiration Date |
Figure 1.10: Rendering of the complex ruby markup in figure 1.9
The example shows that the association of ruby text with base text can be more or less granular as needed. For example, the ruby text can be associated with the entire base text in cases where:
More fine-grained associations can also be made when the relationships are known. For these situations, an improved rendering can therefore be provided. For example, a person's name can be decomposed into family name and given name, or a kanji compound or phrase can be decomposed into semantic subparts or individual characters. With either fine or course granularity, the spans of the ruby text can be set with the corresponding spacing in the base text, and better readability and a more balanced layout may be achieved.
The rp
element is not available in the case of complex ruby
markup. There are two reasons for this. First, the rp
element is
only a fallback mechanism, and it was considered that this is much more
important for the more frequent simple case. Second, for the more complex
cases, it is difficult to come up with a reasonable fallback display, and
constructing markup for such cases can be even more difficult if not
impossible.
In summary, the ruby
element serves as a container for one of
the following:
rb
, rt
and possibly
rp
elements (simple ruby markup) for:
rbc
and one or two
rtc
container elements (complex ruby
markup) for:
This section is normative.
This section contains the formal syntax definition and the specification of the functionality of the ruby markup. Some familiarity with the XHTML Modularization framework, in particular the "Modularization of XHTML" [XHTMLMOD] specification, is assumed.
The following is the abstract definition of the elements for ruby markup, which is consistent with the XHTML Modularization framework [XHTMLMOD]. Further definitions of XHTML abstract modules can be found in [XHTMLMOD].
Elements | Attributes | Minimal Content Model |
---|---|---|
ruby | Common | (rb, (rt | (rp, rt, rp))) |
rbc | Common | rb+ |
rtc | Common | rt+ |
rb | Common | (PCDATA | Inline - ruby)* |
rt | Common, rbspan (CDATA) | (PCDATA | Inline - ruby)* |
rp | Common | PCDATA* |
The maximal content model for the ruby
element is as
follows:
((rb, (rt | (rp, rt, rp))) | (rbc, rtc, rtc?))
The minimal content model for the ruby
element corresponds to
simple ruby markup. The (rbc, rtc, rtc?)
alternative of the
maximal content model for the ruby
element corresponds to
complex ruby markup.
An implementation of this abstract definition as an XHTML DTD module can be found in Appendix A. An XML Schema [XMLSchema] implementation is being worked on (see [ModSchema]).
ruby
elementThe ruby
element is an inline (or text-level) element that
serves as an overall container. It contains either the rb
, rt
and
optional rp
elements (simple ruby markup) or
the rbc
and rtc
elements (complex ruby markup).
In the case of simple ruby markup, the ruby
element contains
either an rb
element followed by an rt
element, or a sequence of an rb
element, an rp
element, an rt
element and another rp
element. The content of the rt
element is taken as ruby text and associated
with the content of the
element as the base text. The content of the rb
rp
elements, if present, is ignored.
In the case of complex ruby markup, the ruby
element contains
an rbc
element followed by one or two rtc
elements. The content of the subelements of
each rtc
element is taken as ruby text and
associated with the content of the subelements of the rbc
element as the base text.
The ruby
element has common attributes only. Examples of
common attributes include: id
, class
or
xml:lang
. Common attributes depend on the markup language with
which ruby markup is used. In the case of [XHTML 1.1],
these are defined in XHTML
Modularization, Section 5.1 [XHTMLMOD].
rbc
elementThe rbc
(ruby base container) element serves as the container
for rb
elements in the case of complex ruby
markup. Only one rbc
element may appear inside a ruby
element.
The rbc
element has common attributes only.
rtc
elementThe rtc
(ruby text container) element serves as the container
for rt
elements in the case of complex ruby
markup. One or two rtc
elements may appear inside a ruby
element to associate ruby texts with a
single base text, represented by an rbc
element. More than two rtc
elements MUST NOT appear inside a ruby
element.
The rtc
element has common attributes only.
rb
elementThe rb
(ruby base) element serves to markup the base text.
For simple ruby markup, only one rb
element may appear. For
complex ruby markup, multiple rb
elements may appear inside an
rbc
element. Each rb
element is
associated with a corresponding rt
element,
for fine-grained control of ruby presentation.
The rb
element may contain inline elements or character data
as its content, but the ruby
element is not
allowed as its descendant element.
The rb
element has common attributes only.
rt
elementThe rt
element is the markup for ruby text. For simple ruby
markup, only one rt
element may appear. For complex ruby markup,
multiple rt
elements may appear inside an rtc
element, and each rt
element
contains the ruby text for the relevant base text, represented by the
corresponding rb
element.
The rt
element may contain inline elements or character data
as its content, but the ruby
element is not
allowed as its descendant element.
The rt
element has common attributes and the
rbspan
attribute. In complex ruby markup, the
rbspan
attribute allows an rt
element to span
multiple rb
elements. The value shall be an
integer value greater than zero ("0"). The default value of this attribute is
one ("1"). The rbspan
attribute should not be used in simple
ruby markup, and user agents should ignore the rbspan
attribute
when it appears in simple ruby markup.
rp
elementThe rp
element can be used in the case of simple ruby markup
to specify characters that can denote the beginning and end of ruby text when
user agents do not have other ways to present ruby text distinctively from
the base text. Parentheses (or similar characters) can provide an acceptable
fallback. In this situation, ruby text will only degrade to be rendered
inline and enclosed in the fallback parentheses. This is the least
inappropriate rendering under the condition that only inline rendering is
available. The rp
element cannot be used with complex ruby
markup.
The rp
element has common attributes only.
Using parentheses for the fallback may lead to confusion between runs of text intended to be ruby text and other runs that happen to be enclosed within parentheses. The document or style sheet author should be aware of the potential for that confusion and is advised to choose an unambiguous delimiter for the fallback.
This section is informative.
This section discusses various aspects of rendering and styling in the context of ruby markup as defined in this document. However, this document does not specify any mechanisms for presentation/styling; this is left to the respective style sheet languages. Formatting properties for styling ruby are under development for CSS and XSL. See for example "CSS3 module: Ruby" [CSS3-RUBY] (work in progress) for more details.
Details of ruby formatting in a Japanese print context can be found in JIS-X-4051 [JIS4051].
The term "ruby" in Japanese is only used for text visually rendered alongside the base text. Considerations for such cases are given in section 3.2 (font size), section 3.3 (positioning), and section 3.4 (presentation of ruby markup). This kind of presentation should be used wherever possible. However, introducing ruby to the Web may lead to some phenomena and problems that are not present in traditional typography. Structural markup for ruby, as defined in this specification, cannot guarantee that ruby text will always be rendered alongside the base text. There are a very wide variety of current and future output devices for documents marked up with XHTML. The following are possible scenarios and reasons for different rendering:
In typical usage, the font size of ruby text is normally about half the font size of the base text. In fact, the name "ruby" originated from the name of the 5.5pt font size in British printing, which is about half the 10pt font size commonly used for normal text.
There are several positions where the ruby text can appear relative to its base text. Because East Asian text may be rendered vertically as well as horizontally, the terms "before" and "after" are used here rather than "above" and "below" or "right side" and "left side". The words "before" and "after" should be understood as "before"/"after" the line containing the base text. The correspondence is shown in the following table:
terminology | Horizontal Layout (left-to-right, top-to-bottom) |
Vertical Layout (top-to-bottom, right-to-left) |
---|---|---|
before | above | right-side |
after | below | left-side |
Ruby texts are most frequently placed before the base text (see figure 1.1 and figure 3.2). Sometimes, especially in horizontal educational documents, ruby text may appear after the base text, i.e. below (see figure 3.1). In Chinese, it is rather common that Pinyin ruby text appears after the base text. Ruby text may also appear after the base text in vertical layout (see figure 3.3). In all these cases, the writing direction of the ruby text is the same as that of its base text, that is vertical if the base text is vertical, and horizontal if the base text is horizontal.
In traditional Chinese texts, "Bopomofo" ruby text can appear along the right side of the base text even in horizontal layout.
Figure 3.4: "Bopomofo" ruby text in traditional Chinese (ruby text shown in blue/red for clarity) in horizontal layout
Note that Bopomofo tone marks (in the above example shown in red for clarity) seem to appear in a separate column (along the right side of the Bopomofo ruby text) and therefore might be seen as "ruby on ruby". However, they are simply encoded as part of the ruby text. The details of this encoding are not addressed in this document.
This specification does not prescribe how ruby markup will be displayed. Style sheets, in general, will be used to specify the exact behavior of ruby markup.
Note. Although the rendering of the ruby texts should be controlled by style sheets, in case no style information is provided by the author or the user, it is recommended that visual user agents place the ruby text before the base text when only one ruby text is used. This is also the case for simple ruby. When there are two ruby texts, the first ruby text should be placed before the base text, and the second ruby text should be placed after the base text. A sample user agent default style sheet which describes this formatting will be provided by [CSS3-RUBY] or its successor document.
For non-visual rendering, in the absence of style sheet information, it is recommended that both the base text and the ruby text(s) should be rendered, with an indication (e.g. different voice, different pitch, ...) of the status of each.
<ruby xml:lang="ja"> <rbc> <rb>斎</rb> <rb>藤</rb> <rb>信</rb> <rb>男</rb> </rbc> <rtc class="reading"> <rt>さい</rt> <rt>とう</rt> <rt>のぶ</rt> <rt>お</rt> </rtc> <rtc class="annotation"> <rt rbspan="4" xml:lang="en">W3C Associate Chairman</rt> </rtc> </ruby>
Figure 3.5: Ruby markup with class
and
xml:lang
attributes.
Using a style sheet specifying horizontal text, rendering of the reading before the base text, and rendering of the annotation after the base text, the markup above could be rendered like this:
Figure 3.6: Horizontal rendering of two ruby texts associated with a single base text.
Documents containing ruby markup may in some cases need to be rendered by non-visual user agents such as voice browsers and braille user agents. For such rendering scenarios, it is important to understand that:
Depending on a user's needs, the way a text should be read may vary from very quick and 'cursory' reading to very careful and detailed reading. This may lead to different ways of treating ruby text in non-visual rendering, from skipping ruby text in fast reading to detailed exploration of the ruby structure and the actual characters used in careful reading.
In the frequent case that ruby texts represent reading, rendering both the base text and the ruby text may produce annoying duplications. A speech synthesizer may be able to correctly pronounce the base text based on a large dictionary, or it may in other cases be able to select the right pronunciation based on the reading given by the ruby text.
Not all ruby texts represent pronunciations. Authors should distinguish
ruby texts used for different purposes by using the class
attribute. This is demonstrated above by using class="reading"
for ruby text used to indicate reading.
Ruby text indicating reading may not produce the correct pronunciation even in cases where the script used at first glance seems perfectly phonetic. For example, Bopomofo is associated independently for each character of the base text; context-dependent sound or tone changes are not reflected. Similarly, in Japanese, spelling irregularities can occur, such as using "は" (hiragana ha) for the topic suffix pronounced "わ" (wa), or using vowels for indicating lengthening. For such cases, authors may want to supply the actual pronunciation with special markup designed for that purpose, or may rely on the aural rendering system being able to handle such cases correctly.
rp
elementIf the author is not concerned about fallbacks for user agents that
neither know about ruby markup nor support CSS2 [CSS2] or XSL [XSL]
style sheets, then the rp
elements are not needed.
Nevertheless, it is possible to parenthesize ruby text as a fallback if for example the device resolution is not appropriate for traditional ruby rendering. Using [CSS2], the parentheses can be generated using the 'content' property ([CSS2], section 12.2) with the :before and :after pseudo-elements ([CSS2], section 12.1), as for example in the following style fragment:
rt:before { content: "(" } rt:after { content: ")" }
Figure 3.8: CSS2 style fragment to
generate parentheses around an rt
element
In the above example, parentheses will be automatically generated around
the rt
element. It is assumed that the above style rules are
used together with style rules that position the ruby text inline. Generation
of parentheses is straightforward with XSLT [XSLT].
This section is normative.
Within the context of this specification, conformance can be claimed for markup, document types, module implementations, documents, generators, and interpreters. In most of these cases, two levels of conformance are available: simple conformance and full conformance. Simple conformance means that the conforming object supports the minimal content model of the ruby element in section 2.1, i.e. only simple ruby markup. Full conformance means that the conforming object supports the maximal content model of the ruby element in section 2.1, i.e. that both simple and complex ruby markup are supported.
Markup is conforming simple ruby markup if it contains one or
more ruby
elements and the content of all those elements
(including their children) conforms to the minimal content model in section 2.1 (i.e.
only simple ruby markup is allowed). Markup is conforming full ruby
markup if it contains one or more ruby
elements and the
content of all those elements (including their children) conforms to the
maximal content model in section 2.1 (i.e.
both simple and complex ruby markup is allowed).
A document type is a conforming simple ruby markup document type
if it integrates conforming simple ruby markup by adding the
ruby
element to the appropriate elements (such as inline
elements) and by defining the necessary elements and attributes. A document
type is a conforming full ruby markup document type if it integrates
conforming full ruby markup by adding the ruby
element to the
appropriate elements (such as inline elements) and by defining the necessary
elements and attributes.
A module implementation (e.g. with DTD or XML Schema technology) is a conforming simple ruby module implementation if it is designed to integrate simple ruby markup with other modules into document types as described above. A module implementation is a conforming complex ruby module implementation if it is designed to integrate full ruby markup with other modules into document types as described above. A module implementation is a conforming full ruby module implementation if it is designed to integrate either simple or full ruby markup with other modules into document types as described above (e.g. by providing a switch, or by providing two separate module implementations).
A document is a conforming simple ruby markup document if it contains conforming simple ruby markup and does not contain complex ruby markup or non-conforming ruby markup. A document is a conforming full ruby markup document if it contains conforming full ruby markup and does not contain non-conforming ruby markup.
A generator is a conforming simple ruby markup generator if it generates conforming simple ruby markup and does not generate complex ruby markup or non-conforming ruby markup. A generator is a conforming full ruby markup generator if it generates conforming full ruby markup and does not generate non-conforming ruby markup.
An interpreter is a conforming simple ruby markup interpreter if it rejects nonconforming simple ruby markup, accepts conforming simple ruby markup, and, where it interprets ruby markup, does so in accordance with this specification. An interpreter is a conforming full ruby markup interpreter if it rejects nonconforming ruby markup, accepts conforming full ruby markup, and, where it interprets ruby markup, does so in accordance with this specification. Examples of interpreters are server-side analysis or transformation tools and renderers.
For XHTML Modularization conformance, please see section 3 of [XHTMLMOD].
This appendix is informative.
The following is a link to the Ruby DTD module that is used in XHTML 1.1 [XHTML11].
This appendix is informative. This appendix contains some notes on design decisions, based on questions and comments received during the Last Call review.
There were proposals to change e.g. <rbc><rb>...</rbc> to <rb><rbc>...</rb> (and similar for rt/rtc). This looks in some way more natural. However, in XML, the content of an element is either mixed content (both character data and elements, without sequence or occurrence restrictions) or element content (only elements, with restrictions). This means that it is impossible to say that <rb> contains either only <rbc> elements or only character data and inline elements.
There were various proposals for removing the rp
element from the minimal content model. They were
considered, but rejected for the following reasons:
rp
elements by a receiver understanding ruby markup is extremely simple to
implement; the burden on implementations is minimal. Both CSS and XSL
provide easy mechanisms to remove the rp
elements or to avoid displaying them.It was suggested to change the names of the elements, in particular to change <ruby> to <gloss>. However, while ruby markup is indeed in some way similar to the markup that would be needed for glosses, it is not designed for that purpose.
This appendix is informative.
For historical reasons, some authoring tools might generate ruby markup
without the start and end tags of the rb
element, like:
<ruby> A <rp>(</rp><rt>aaa</rt><rp>)</rp> </ruby>
rather than the following:
<ruby> <rb>A</rb> <rp>(</rp><rt>aaa</rt><rp>)</rp> </ruby>
The former markup is not conforming to this specification, but user agents that care about compatibility with documents generated by such authoring tools may treat the former markup as if it were written like the latter.
This appendix is informative.
This appendix is informative.
Changes from the Proposed Recommendation (http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/PR-ruby-20010406):
This section is informative.
Takao Suzuki (鈴木 孝雄) and Chris Wilson have contributed to previous drafts as editors.
This specification would not have been possible without the help from the members of the W3C I18N WG, in particular Mark Davis and Hideki Hiura (樋浦 秀邪), and the members of the W3C I18N IG.
Additional contributors include Murray Altheim, Laurie Anna Edlund, Arye Gittelma, Koji Ishii, Rick Jelliffe, Eric LeVine, Chris Lilley, Charles McCathieNevile, Shigeki Moro (師 茂邪), Chris Pratley, Nobuo Saito (斎藤 信男), Rahul Sonnad, Chris Thrasher.
The markup defined in this specification was coordinated with the ruby
markup in [JIS4052], developed by WG 2 (Typesetting) of
the Electronic Document Processing System Standardization Investigation and
Research Committee of the Japanese Standards Association. We would like to
thank the members of WG 2, in particular Kohji Shibano (芝摸 耕司,
chair), and Masafumi Yabe (家辺 勝文, liaison), for their collaboration.
Technically, the markup for ruby in [JIS4052] differs
from the markup in this specification in two points: First, there is an
alternative form of markup not compatible with XML, based on special symbols,
and second, the rp
element is not
permitted.
Valuable Last Call comments were also received from: The HTML WG, the CSS WG, the XSL WG, the WAI P&F WG, Steven Pemberton, Trevor Hill, Susan Lesch, and Frank Yung-Fong Tang. Akira Uchida (内田 明) provided feedback from a translator's viewpoint.
An earlier proposal for markup for ruby, using attributes, is described in [DUR97].